The Procurist

The Procurist

Loyalty Is Not Laziness. But It Has to Be Proven Every Year.

The question “why are we still with the same supplier?” has a good answer. Most procurement teams just cannot produce it on demand.

Global Supply Chain Council and Matthew Lehman
Oct 24, 2026
∙ Paid

The challenge usually arrives from outside procurement, and it sounds reasonable. The framework agreement is performing. Quality is being met, technical specifications hold, deliveries arrive on time, the commercial terms are competitive. Then someone in a review meeting asks the question anyway: why are we still dealing with the same supplier, and where is the value if we are not bringing new suppliers to the table?

Ayah Adel Abu Hashish, a procurement engineer and category lead at Group AMANA, described exactly that situation and gave the answer most procurement professionals would give. The market had already been scanned before the agreement was signed. Potential suppliers had been assessed. For that particular item, only a small number could consistently meet the technical and quality standards. Introducing a new supplier for the sake of having more suppliers, or defaulting to the lowest price, is not a strategy. Some categories have to be managed on quality and technical compliance, reliability, capacity and lead time, commercial competitiveness, supply risk and long-term value together.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Global Supply Chain Council.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Global Supply Chain Council LLC · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture